Comments for page "Vedic Time System"

(no title)

Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:04:46 +0000

this time cycle is correct. there is one kerala man who knows the truth of this calculation.

(no title)

Sat, 23 Jun 2012 06:44:47 +0000

Nice Article and well written. I like to mentioned more details.

Time is cyclic. How ? See as belows :

1) 360 Days of Human is 1 Day of Devta ( Indra etc)
2) 12000 Years of Devta is 1 Day of Isvar Brahma same years as 1 Night
3) 100 Years of Isvar Brahma is 1 Prahar of Vishnu
4) 100 Years of Vishnu is 1 Ghadi of Shiva
5) 100 Years of Shiva is 1 "Pal" of Shakti.
6) 100 Years of Shakti is 1 "Vi-pal" of Narayana (Par-Brahma)
7) Narayana have 100 years of "Svapna Avastha" when world run, 100 years of "Sushupti Avastha" which is deep sleep. 100 Years of "Jagrad" Avastha when is Narayana is awake.
8) Param-Bramha have Kumbhak which 100 Years of "Jagrad" Avastha of Narayana,
9) Param-Bramha have Rechak which 100 Years of "Svapna " Avastha of Narayana
10) Param-Bramha have Puraka which 100 Years of "Sushupti " Avastha of Narayana

When Narayana get in "Svapna Avastha" , he creates this world as it was before with word "Om ekom Bhau-shyam" and make it "small" in "bija" by saying "Om-soham" when he completes 100 years of "Svapna Avastha".

11) Ishvar Brahma shrusti is consist of 3 lokas " Swarga", "Mrutuyu" , "Patala".

— Good luck

(no title)

Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:06:44 +0000

Is this vedic time system matching age of earth ( about 4.6 billion human years by mostly heared from science .
www.unm.edu/iom/eps365/9.Earth.ppt)?

(no title)

Sun, 17 Apr 2011 02:34:17 +0000

nice reply

Re: Time is not Linear

Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:43:49 +0000

In reality, everything in nature observed is in cycles-like the examples given in this article which gives events from smallest to largest. In modern science too our reference is atomic clock. Even here an event or period is one complete cycle. This may appear linear to us to our current dimensions but it may not be linear to cosmic reference in which case time may not be constant or linear. Time as such does not exist, but it's concept is modern convenience to compare different cycles for earth processes.

Time is not Linear

Tue, 11 May 2010 09:28:52 +0000

Of course there is a fascinating angle to the Vedic Concept of Time. The division of a second to a paramanu (60,750th of a second), for example - the paramanu exists because it must have been used for mathematical calculations for science, astronomy etc. Why else would they even have these definitions.

But Where I disagree with this article is - the division of time to its smallest possible duration (paramanu) or its longest duration (yugas) still implies that time is linear. Just because a seed turns into a sapling and then into a tree, and then dies only to give birth to another tree before it dies, doesn not imply that time itself is cyclical.

Vedic concept of time says - that al time is simultaneous, all events exisit simultaneously. There is no beginning and no end. And that time does not go from one phase to another phase. All things (past, present, future) exist simultaneously. What we see as cycles, in reality neither begin nor end. That is the concept which is difficult to understand. Even the scientists are beginning to say that if time where linear, time itself could not exist.