Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page »

क्ष्मी के आठ स्वरुप ]लक्ष्मी के आठ स्वरुप]धन की देवी लक्ष्मी जी हैं। धन के विना  संसार का कोई  सुख सम्भव नहीं। कहा जाता कि, वैसे तो संसार में अनेक प्रकार के दुःख हैं।  लेकिन, दारिद्र्य दुःख से बढ़कर कोई बड़ा दुःख नहीं है। दारिद्र्य निवारण के लिए लक्ष्मी के आठ स्वरुप की पूजा अर्चना फलदायी

Achyuthan (guest) 15 Jan 2017 14:44
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Sanatana Dharma


by Achyuthan (guest), 15 Jan 2017 14:44
ca subhash misra (guest) 24 Dec 2016 13:01
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Kundalini


Please attempt to provide reference to spraitual liturature

by ca subhash misra (guest), 24 Dec 2016 13:01
Sheera Betnag (guest) 23 Dec 2016 05:42
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Sanatana Dharma

out of the blues i ran a search on " Sanathana dharma ". esply this article on wikidot is informative. Its very interesting how one live and connect with Universe.

by Sheera Betnag (guest), 23 Dec 2016 05:42

Simple question to Sachin. Does the current scientific paradigm accept reincarnation which is central to Hindu dharma? The answer is NO. So will that invalidate Hindu dharma? That means we Hindus should accept single birth only?
I really find it funny when some Hindus makes desperate attempt to validate Hindu dharma by conforming to current scientific paradigms. I am a scientific person, but that does not means I take everything currently assumed by the current scientific community to be true. I know their limitations and many inaccuracies. Some are outright illogical.

Why talk about “Maslow's hierarchy of needs” when in Hindu dharma we have a more refined and advanced concept known as PanchaKoshas?

Simple question to Sachin by mvishnumvishnu, 15 Dec 2016 05:50
Sachin (guest) 13 Dec 2016 12:43
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Darwin's Theory of Evolution

My intention is not to offend, but to bring out the truth. So, I'm sorry if I offend. AUM shantih shantih shantihi.

Seriously? Now, even Hinduism opposes Evolution? Seriously?! Are all religions this dumb? No, no, I don't believe it. Hinduism doesn't contradict science as far as I know.

After reading this article I feel bad.

4 points I'd like to make:
1. Evolution and speciation doesn't contradict Hinduism as far as I know.. Samkhya sutras talk about ennumeration, which I find to be similar to evolution. Advaithic philosophies speak about how the universal self evolved into Ishwara, which in turn evolved into Jiva by being entangled in Maya. So, if the origin of the universe is in the form of a sort of evolution, wouldn't life follow simple to complex? I'm not talking as a science person, I'm talking as a spiritual seeker, not as a knower. Even 10 avatars of vishnu follow a sort of evolution from fish(matsya) to reptile(and kinda amphibian by habitat.. koorma) to mammal(boar) to half-man half-animal(Narsimh) to dwarf man(monkey-looking short guy without a tail.. vamana) to moral/ethical/noble man(true man rama) to intellectual man(civilizations with all it's complexities..krishna) to questioning guy(buddha) to the future(kalki.) Also, just because puranas follow a creationist pattern doesn't mean we have to assume that vedas and upanishads also follow this pattern.. but then again, we can never know we as a civilization have lost so many books under invasions. Heck.. even souls evolve from being a lower species such as insects, plants and animals until one day we're born as humans. Even human consciousness evolves from muladhara to sahasrara.

2.a.) There is no such thing as half species. You have got science wrong. Consult a biologist today to get your facts right, and let him not be less than a Ph.D scholar who's a professor. Suppose there are few organisms. These organisms reproduce and there are many now. There is a selection pressure from the outer world and the animals which don't have what it takes perish (may be because of karma?) Before there was even a selection pressure, there was a variety of beings because of mutations and genetic (re)combinations. When an organism dies, it's genetic code dies. So over time, there is a huge difference between two organisms in terms of their body structure and genetic code that they can no longer mingle and reproduce, this results in speciation.
b.) "Half-species" is a concept from use and disuse of organs and characters. This is a theory of Lamarck and it is "LAMARCKISM." According to Lamarckism, an ancestor of giraffe probably had a short neck. Over time it tried extending the neck and legs.. extended it again and again, and across many generations which have resulted in giraffes. Now the intermediate generations can be considered quarter species, half species and so on. NOW LAMARCKISM IS A DISPROVED THEORY IN SCIENCE WHICH HAS BEEN REJECTED A LONG LONG TIME AGO. WHAT YOU'VE WRITTEN HERE IS LAMARCKISM, NOT THE DARWINIAN CONCEPT OF EVOLUTION.

3. Now, in the first point I've pointed out that science and spirituality are not opposing forces, in the second I've pointed out that the scientific facts in this article are not accurate. Okay, let me not sugar coat. The facts are wrong. Now, the third point I'd like make is that evolution is a limited theory and an incomplete theory, THAT I DO AGREE WITH YOU, but I'd like to add it may be incomplete and limited, but not completely inaccurate. The reason is.. Darwinian evolution speaks about only two areas of human consciousness: the survival and the reproduction: in other words, it acknowledges only the functions of root/earth chakra and sacral/water chakra. If Darwinism was completely true, we humans would be focused only on survival and reproduction. There are other areas of human consciousness: such as, ACHIEVEMENT NEEDS(fire chakra) A DESIRE TO SELFLESSLY SERVE(Air chakra) THE NEED TO SELF ACTUALIZE AND GUIDE (ether/throat chakra,) THE ABILITY TO TRANSCEND (ajna) THE STATE OF BEING CONNECTED WITH GOD (sahasrara.) In the future there may be a theory of Evolution that incorporates these elements. But, until then the world has to accept Darwinian Evolution.

4. Although biology is not good enough, there are some theories in psychology that are good(good doesn't mean perfect). There is Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Google it.

jai shri raam!!

by Sachin (guest), 13 Dec 2016 12:43
rameshlal (guest) 04 Dec 2016 20:38
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Do You Know?

SIR क्या आप बता सकते है की महाभारत में कितने श्लोक है , १००,००० नहीं है ये FIGURE गलत है . क्या आप बता सकते है की महाभारत की लडाई त्रेता में ,दोव्यप्र में. या कलयुग में हुई थी . द्वापर कब शुरु हुआ और कब ख़त्म हो गया ! क्या आप बतायेंगे की पहले दव्प्र्र आया था या त्रेता !क्या आप बतायेंगे की रावन को किस ने मारा था !क्या आप बतायेंगे की कौरव और पांडवो में कौन सब से समझदार था और कौन सब से मुर्ख था !क्या आप बतायेंगे की महाभारत में धर्म किस ने बचाया था! कृष्ण , भीष्म, युधिस्टर,अर्जुन, दुर्योधन,एकलव्य ,अश्व्थामा, कुत्ते ने, या कर्ण ने बचाया था , ककून ठीक थे कौरव ग्रुप ने या पांडव ग्रुप ने या किसी ने भी नहीं …!
rest later ..

by rameshlal (guest), 04 Dec 2016 20:38
rameshlal (guest) 04 Dec 2016 20:15
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Do You Know?


अब तो देख इसे जागो !
धनानंद को जड़ समेत ऊखाडो !

ये धनानंद है कौन कौन ? ( जितने देश के चरित्रहीन और बेईमान राजनेतिक , धार्मिक,व्यवसाहिक,सुचना व प्रसारण (मीडियाकर्मियों ) व शिक्षा और खेल जगत के आक्का उर्फ़ भांड नेता है जो खुद को खुदा मानते है.
भाग्य के बने हुए तुम्हारे विधाता है -ये सब धनानंद की नस्ल है और इनके नाती भक्त ).

लो अखंड प्रतिज्ञा आचार्य चाणक्य की तरह , की जब तक आप इनको जड़ समेत उखाडके ब्रह्माण्ड से बाहर नहीं फेंक दोगे तब तलक चैन की नींद नहीं सॉगे !
फिर देखो विश्व खुशहाल और शांति प्रिय बनता है की नहीं !

ये असली धरा पर पाप है …irrespective of caste, creed, religion and country, all over the universe).

जो सत्य की बात करते है और असत्य का काम और नाम करते है!

राष्ट्र, व्यक्ति से महान होता है ,
इसलिए, कोई भी व्यक्ति,
उसका ना बाप होता है !

जो लोग अपने आगे बापू लगाते है !
और राष्ट्र का पिताश्री बन जाते है !
वो राष्ट्र से भी महान हो जाते है !

वो राष्ट्र के बच्चो की माँयों के नजायज खस्म बन जाते है !
सतियों के भी नाम कलंकित कराते है!
सती के बच्चे को भी , दो बापों की औलाद कहलाते है !
एक फूल, दो माली का जुमला मस्त गाते है
वही तो असल में पापी कहलाते है !

चेक अब स्वयं करलो!
किस किस ने अपने आगे बापू, पिता का संभोधन लगाया है !
ख़ुशी ख़ुशी तुम ने भी इसे अपनाया है !
अपने को दो बापों की औलाद कह्लाया!
तभी तो कॉलेज की रैगिंग में,
मुर्ख बच्चा बोल ना पाया है,

जिसने सतियों को कुपित कराया है ,
माँ सती को महा त्रिकाली बनाया है ,
इनकी मायावी माँयों बहनों के मुहं पे तमच्चा लगाया है !
इनके फिर भी समझ नहीं आया है !
मोदी ने वही फोटो, नोटो पर फिर से चिपकाया है !
इसी लिए तो मुर्ख कहलाया है !

वैसे तो विपक्ष में अपने इस बापू के निक्कमे पण को रोते है
सत्ता में आते ही इसकी कब्र पे नतमस्तक होते है !
है ना पक्के पांजी ..है ना इस नकली बापू के असली बच्चे !
Modern लुगाई के Modern बच्चे !

चरित्र के कितने सच्चे, है पुरे कच्चे !

तभी चाणक्य ने फ़रमाया है !
जब जब राजा अपने आप को भगवान कहलाया !
उसने राष्ट्र का विनाश करवाया!

अब स्वयं देखो !
कौन कौन तुम्हारे घर घर में जबर्दस्ती घुस आया !

हर हर… घर घर… कौन कहलाया ..?
हर हर महादेव , घर घर महादेव …तो ठीक है ! आदि काल से चला आया !
दूसरा हर हर "मोदी " , घर घर "मोदी"…ये भक्तों ने बनाया !
क्या त्रिकाल से पास कराया !?..

सुषमा स्मृति ने भी खूब गाया !
मोदी ये सुण खूब इठलाया! ,
मंद मंद मन ही मन मुस्कुराया,
अपने को 56 का बताया , इसका मतलब तक समझ ना पाया ..

तभी तो मोदी =महादेव भक्तों का कहलाया ..
म=म , डी=डी , MD उर्फ़ MD =MA-DHURI..माया-DEVI
अब स्वयं देखो , किस ने चाणक्य की वाणी को सच कर दिखाया !
किस किस ने अपने ऊपर पुराण और चालीसा लिखवाया .
बिना महादेव से प्रमाणित कराया!

तुम ने उनकी मूर्तियों को अपने अपने घरों में खुशी ख़ुशी पुजवाया!

तभी तो तुम्हारी समझ में ना चाणक्य और ना महाभारत आया! ..
तभी तो अपने आप को दो बापों का कुपु्त कहलवाया ..
अपने असली और नकली बाप का खूब नाम रोशन कराया ..
तभी तो तुम पन्द्रुक के वंशज कहलाये ..

जो अपने पिता इंद्र को भी ना पहचान पाए ! ..

पांडव नहीं हो तुम !?
..अब शर्माना छोडो
.अब घबराना छोड़ा .अपने वंश का राज स्वयं खोलो !..
तुम्हारे सब राज हम जान गए है ..तुम ह्मे नहीं पहचाने !?
हम तो तुम्हे आदि ही काल से पहचान गए है! ..
असली नस्ल के हो ..पक्के हो!
ये दुर्वााशा जी पहचान गए है !.

चाणक्य की वाणी का "सच" सच्च सच्च बोलो ..!

अब तो सिंहासन छोडो! …असली वाले तुम्हारे चचा जानी आ गए है !

अरे दीवानों! ..चचा जानी को पहचानों ..!
ये कौन है चचा जानी !!?

जय हो पंगेबाजों की!

हम है असली पंगेबाज !

जय दुर्योधन जय कर्ण एकलव्य जरासंध शिशुपाल दुशासन और अश्वथामा की !

by rameshlal (guest), 04 Dec 2016 20:15
Deben Sahani (guest) 01 Dec 2016 06:31
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Brahman

Very nice article..thank you so much

by Deben Sahani (guest), 01 Dec 2016 06:31
B B KOCHGAVAY (guest) 11 Nov 2016 06:49
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Nada Bindu Upanishad

very powerful gift to India by RISHIS

by B B KOCHGAVAY (guest), 11 Nov 2016 06:49
Sudhir (guest) 13 Oct 2016 08:00
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » sastra

I want this is to be in Hindi

by Sudhir (guest), 13 Oct 2016 08:00

धन की देवी लक्ष्मी जी हैं। धन के विना  संसार का कोई  सुख सम्भव नहीं। कहा जाता कि, वैसे तो संसार में अनेक प्रकार के दुःख हैं।  लेकिन, दारिद्र्य दुःख से बढ़कर कोई बड़ा दुःख नहीं है। दारिद्र्य निवारण के लिए लक्ष्मी के आठ स्वरूप की पूजा अर्चना फलदायी सिद्ध होता है।

Jezus (guest) 04 Oct 2016 19:58
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Darwin's Theory of Evolution

sadly finding this nonsense article I didn't even bother to read in its entirety will prevent me from looking more onto this website wich seemed interesting …
evolution is a fact wether you like it or not and there is plenty of proof of it
and people should learn to include scientific facts in their beliefs … spirtuality and science are not foes …
scriptures are man made and man is faillible … and use the knowledge he has at its time … the earth isn't on top of 4 elephants on top of a turtle surrounded by a snake anymore …

by Jezus (guest), 04 Oct 2016 19:58
Cliff Oliver (guest) 04 Oct 2016 03:18
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Ancient City Found in India, Irradiated from Atomic Blast

The vitrification was probably caused by plasma discharges of the sun heating up at the end of the last ice age. Our atmosphere was not strong enough to hold back these solar eruptions thus the ending of the ice age suddenly, 1-3 years. There is other evidence throughout the world of ancient sites experiencing the same vitrification of rocks. To be more exact the end of the ice age happened 9,700 BCE which would fit into this article time-frame.

by Cliff Oliver (guest), 04 Oct 2016 03:18
Peter Nowak (guest) 03 Oct 2016 13:13
in discussion General Discussion / Ideas » The vedic Yuga-System is wrong

I just want to add: The constellation Draco is called Vasuki in the description of the churning of the milk ocean, because Mount Meru symbolizes the north pole which you can see for example in Mahabharata 3.104.2.

I must add also that the Lingam of Shiva probably only symbolizes the magnetic north pole. But that it was located on the Kailasa you can see on the relief of the dancing Shiva at Ellora Caves in India (on the bottom left; the fotograph is unfortunately removed from the wikipedia side on Nataraja but it is the first picture you will see if you search with google the terms: "Nataraja Ellora Caves" without quotation marks). According to the Vedas this was originally the only place on earth where sacrifices took place. This was also the place of the Sacrifice of Daksa which is very famous.

by Peter Nowak (guest), 03 Oct 2016 13:13
Peter Nowak (guest) 03 Oct 2016 12:20
in discussion General Discussion / Ideas » The vedic Yuga-System is wrong

You have to read the description to understand it: If the bull holds the earth stationary it will be a pole star which in the Rigveda is located in the Big Dipper. The snake is a little difficult. The snake Ananda on which Vishnu sleeps ist our galaxy, while the snake Shiva wears round his neck is the constellation Draco which lies around the pole. Because of your description I think this is meant here. The connection of Shiva and the pole ist that the pole was according to the Puranas once (before the flood) located at Mount Kailasa which is the seat of Shiva. This is also depicted in the Mahabharata several times. The Lingam of Shiva symbolizes the axis of the earth which is otherwise often (in other cultures also) depicted as a tree. Generally most of the mythological discriptions of the Hindhus relate to astronomical facts only we are not able (or just with difficulty) to understand the pictures.

by Peter Nowak (guest), 03 Oct 2016 12:20
Peter Nowak (guest) 03 Oct 2016 10:10
in discussion General Discussion / Ideas » The vedic Yuga-System is wrong

I already read Sri Yuktesvar but he is wrong in terms of the source of the error and also in terms of the length of a precession cycle.

by Peter Nowak (guest), 03 Oct 2016 10:10
Peter Nowak (guest) 03 Oct 2016 09:14
in discussion General Discussion / Ideas » The vedic Yuga-System is wrong

I have not said Berossos had used the Vedas but the Surya Siddantha which is in my opinion the oldest still available scripture but at least 3 times revised. The point is that Surya Siddhanta claimes in 1, 2 f. and 1, 57 to be written at the end of the Krita Yuga and contains the indian yuga system. So this fits very well to the cited statement of Berossos. But there is more evidence. Berossos tells about ten Kings before the flood which were also mentioned in Aitareya Brahmana 8.4.21 - 23. Therefore the flood Berossos mentiones and which is also mentioned in the Gilgamesh epic is identical with the flood of the Puranas and the Mahabharata after which our Manvantara of Manu Vaivasvata started. Even so Berossos tells that at the time of the ten kings before the flood teachers came from the sea and teached men, the first of which was Oannes by name. According to him it were 3 different teachers who teached at different times at different locations. All this fits very well with the dravidian tradition of the sangam universities of Kumari Kandam. So for me it is unquestionably clear that Berossos is based on indian sources for no one else is handing down such informations.
The age of the universe is calculated in Yugas and Manvantaras, but the yuga system is based on the precession cycle before the flood which lasted according to Berossos 43.200 years (a "Saros" of 3600 years means one sign of the zodiac a precession month, a "Neros" of 600 years means a precession week and a "Sossos" of 60 years means half a day that means half a degree of the precession. This is the base of the old calendar which is shown in the Puranas too and is depicted on the socalled sungate of Tiahuanaco). Because a Mahayuga is said to be 4.320.000 years (compare Rigveda 4.58.3a) its length is based on this old precession cycle which changed with the flood. This change is depicted in the Puranas and the Mahabharata in the image of the "churning of the milkocean" which B.G. Siddarth already interpreted correct as (a change of) the rotation of the earth (The Celestial Key To The Vedas page 110).
Yes the end of the Kali Yuga is the beginning of a new Satya or Krita Yuga but what does it mean in terms of my description? And yes the Mahabharata is an epic but it contains very different material (do you think the Bhagavad Gita is also only an epic?) including in book 3 prophecies of the end of our Kali yuga which are very interesting. And also yes the coming avatar of Vishnu is Kalki by the Buddhists called Rudra chakrin, but what they tell about his coming is also identical with the prophecy of the christian bible with respect of the second coming of Jesus. So the coming Jesus seems to be also the last incarnation of Vishnu (which is by the way not the tenth for there are much more Incarnations of Vishnu as also the order of the ten incarnations is wrong). So there are different sources of different people who tell the same things about the coming end of our yuga. Do you think all of them have fantazised? Or do you think they have copied one the other? Why should they have done that? They are rivaling religions! So to me it seems very probably that this are prophecies which will come true but ofcause you can think otherwise.

by Peter Nowak (guest), 03 Oct 2016 09:14
jaya jagganatha dasa (guest) 30 Sep 2016 08:04
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Srishti and Pralaya


by jaya jagganatha dasa (guest), 30 Sep 2016 08:04
Raghavendra Tanguturi (guest) 30 Sep 2016 02:57
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Sanskrit Numbers

Great !!

We had knowledge of these numbers upto that extent in those days.
Proud of our "Dharma". Everything have a reason in our Dharma.

I guess our ancients have more knowledge than us on those days.

Proud of Sanatna Dharmi!!

by Raghavendra Tanguturi (guest), 30 Sep 2016 02:57
page »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License